Tigerdroppings – How it Affects You
Tigerdroppings is the latest and most recent trend in the game world, if you are a member of the game then you have to know about it. The most important thing about tigerdroppings is that it affects you in a very negative way, it has a chilling effect on your speech, it is extremely personal and can bring your reputation into the ground. You will have to take the necessary precautions to avoid it.
A chilling effect on speech
The US government has a lot of power over people’s speech. From using the IRS to seize their property to conducting a thorough investigation into the content of their speeches, the government can take away a person’s liberty or property. This is a chilling effect. It deters free speech.
In order to establish a chilling effect, a plaintiff must prove that he or she was targeted, that there was actual harm, and that objective evidence supports the claim. Usually, these claims are justifiable. However, some investigations do not involve justiciable claims. These are often misguided and have a chilling effect. FIRE has documented these chilling effects on protected speech.
When the government investigates, it is sometimes difficult to know exactly what it is doing. It could be an inquiry into the contents of a speaker’s speech, an inquiry into an official punitive action against a speaker, or a simple inquiry into a person’s conduct. As a result, some subjects of these investigations retain counsel. They might also fear that their explanations will be used against them.
The government can also use a lone actor to do its work. That is what the TigerDroppings claims happened to them. An individual with the handle LAGOPMEMBER posted false information about Southeastern University. Falconer says the person was involved in a political smear campaign and wants to know more about the person.
Government investigators have the right to ask questions and even interview individuals. But, they can only act if they can do so without appearing to overstep their authority. For example, if an investigation is conducted on a person’s speech, the government must avoid looking like it is acting as the author of the material. During the McCarthy era, the Supreme Court explained the concept of a chilling effect in its opinions.
Whether the government should take away someone’s liberty or property, the chilling effect doctrine teaches that the government can only act if it does not appear to be doing so. If the government shows up to every discussion with a badge and a gun, it will make its presence known.